Leaderboard

I found myself in the exact same situation as you about a year ago Eric. I ended up going your initial route with the rear OME MD springs (2922) and it improved so many aspects of the vehicle I never regretted it. Now I personally kind of like the raked out look combined with the fact that I carry a lot of gear on weekends heading to the mountains it seemed like the perfect solution. Well I will say after installing the MD springs just in the rear, it was too stink bug looking even for me, I didn't let it stay like that for long. With likely sagging front springs as well, the disparagement was too much so after a couple months I decided to put MD springs in the front too. For a while I debated whether to actually do the Light Duty springs over the MD because I liked the raked look. Well I'm very glad I didn't, so much so I also added the Rocky-Road front trim packer with my MD springs because I wasn't happy with just the MD springs up front. Even after the springs settle, with just MD in the rear I think it would be too much of a difference. When people say 2" lift, that's from the sagged out state. It's 0.75" of lift over the stock from the factory height. I'd recommend actually just going ahead and doing the OME 2922s in the rear for now and when the funds permit go with the matching springs in the front. You won't regret it and in the meantime the handling of your Pathfinder will feel like new. Despite what people say, worn out springs also have a huge contributor to body roll and polar moment of inertia. My guess is if you went with a factory like replacement for example from Moog, you'd wished you had gotten a lift.