Jump to content
  • Sign In Changes:  You now need to sign in using the email address associated with your account, combined with your current password.  Using your display name and password is no longer supported.

 

  • If you are currently trying to register, are not receiving the validation email, and are using an Outlook, Hotmail or Yahoo domain email address, please change your email address to something other than those (or temporary email providers). These domains are known to have problems delivering emails from the community.

Swapping the arms for more downward travel?


89&90PATHY
 Share

Recommended Posts

Starting my 3" Calmini lift this weekend and I have a question regarding gaining additional downward traval by switching the UCA from side to side. I found this post by Martin Chang on the Nissan Offroad site.

 

"It may be possible to adjust the bumpstop position to allow for a bit more downward travel. This can be done in two ways: replacing the factory bumpstop with a lower one, or by switching the UCA from one side to the other. I could replace the rubber bumpstop to a poly one to gain the clearance, but I like the progressive nature of the rubber one instead.

 

Swapping the arms won't be a very hard operation and both sides are symmetrical. The latter works because the bumpstop extension (welded to the arm) is only on one side of the UCA. By switching arms, the bumpstop will contact the arm itself. Both arms and spindles are identical, so they can be switched quite easily. This will of course increase the suspension travel.If anybody has done this, I would love to know!"

 

Does any one know if this will work? What would be the downside to this? :help:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...