Simon Posted June 14, 2005 Share Posted June 14, 2005 You guys are F*cked! He went before his peers and was found NOT GUILTY. I hope to hell none of you neigh sayers end up with money and have someone make the same accusations towards you. I don't think you'd be too quick in denouncing what is a fair and just system in a hurry if the shoe was on the other foot. Well if you admit to sleeping with little boys and inducing them with alcohol and admitting to it. You should then be casterated Now if this was some sshmuck off the street he would of been found guilty and would of spent the trial in jail! WTF are you talking about. I'm talking about the million dollar pedophile that you are saying is innocent. And if you agree with his antics on what he does to childeren then I put you in the same catagory as him. As KIDS CANNOT PROTECT THEMSELVES!!!! This is why before they tried him they waited for all the evidence and there was a ton with his "home videos" What kind of sick bastard does this to kids and you get off by saying we are f@#cked because he was found not guilty that should be good enough. -thnkboutit- Wake-UP and stop protecting the pedophile!!!!!!!! :oops: Absolutely. Even if there was no sexual acts taking place.......it's still sick!!! :oops: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jj big shoe Posted June 14, 2005 Share Posted June 14, 2005 You guys are F*cked! He went before his peers and was found NOT GUILTY. I hope to hell none of you neigh sayers end up with money and have someone make the same accusations towards you. I don't think you'd be too quick in denouncing what is a fair and just system in a hurry if the shoe was on the other foot. First of all, tone it down. You act as if he's your brother or something. It was a very public trial and opinions may vary as to his innocence. Although some people have expressed a different opinion than yours, they did not attack you with insults so there's no need to use that kind of language here. Secondly, I'll bet you my right eye you wouldn't drop your kids off at Neverland for a sleepover, would you? Now, go find your old sequened glove and moonwalk to Thriller to celebrate that justice has prevailed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Runnerman Posted June 14, 2005 Share Posted June 14, 2005 Secondly, I'll bet you my right eye you wouldn't drop your kids off at Neverland for a sleepover, would you? After his comments your brave to make a bet where you would lose an eye over it. I just can't get over the book of the naked boys in there. Man I believe the jury was bought off. I guess it comes down to what your standards are, like if you have any or not! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dnodog Posted June 14, 2005 Share Posted June 14, 2005 Lets not get personal,honestly he is weird and his having other people kids sleeping in his bed is weird, wrong and whatever. But he was not charged with being weird.. etc etc, he was charged with abuse. The prosecution came up short, because the alleged victim and his family are known liars and scam artisists. Lets be fair if our children were abused by someone...i don't think our first move would be to get our hair done, then call a civil suit lawyer. Assuming he is guilty..... he will get caught and dealt with. Assuming he is not guilty.... I would not blame him if he never helped another child again. What we all must remember is this facts are what the jury has to deal with,.... not emotions. Emotions have put a lot of people in jail... WRONGLY! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Runnerman Posted June 15, 2005 Share Posted June 15, 2005 Well let's see some "Facts" -Video's Of naked Boys -Book of whole lot of Pics of same as above. -Sleeping in the same bed Naked -Alcohol was given to children Yes these are Facts!! Now let's see juror was mad at one of the parents for snapping her fingers at them this was one of the reasons for deciding this way. Another thing if he doesn't help another child, well Hell I'm all for that as this is the kind of help they don't need!!!!! Kids being prostituted is WRONG along with being used. Just remember 1 thing when it comes to kids that are that age are innocent. Plain & simple. (now teenagers different matter). I'm so freaken sick of people when they do this to kids! These are the kids that looked upto him IDOL like status. So I ask are they to blame in your eyes? I think not when it comes to kids and pedophiles I think all those sick b@stards should be casterated! Just think how this messes these kids up when grow up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vsicks Pathy Posted June 15, 2005 Share Posted June 15, 2005 (edited) You guys are F*cked! He went before his peers and was found NOT GUILTY. I hope to hell none of you neigh sayers end up with money and have someone make the same accusations towards you. I don't think you'd be too quick in denouncing what is a fair and just system in a hurry if the shoe was on the other foot. First of all, tone it down. You act as if he's your brother or something. It was a very public trial and opinions may vary as to his innocence. Although some people have expressed a different opinion than yours, they did not attack you with insults so there's no need to use that kind of language here. Secondly, I'll bet you my right eye you wouldn't drop your kids off at Neverland for a sleepover, would you? Now, go find your old sequened glove and moonwalk to Thriller to celebrate that justice has prevailed. Tone what down massa? Eyes been a good nigga; please massa dun beats me no mo. You my friend, do not understand your own legal system do you? HE WAS FOUND NOT GUILTY! I don't see you pissing and moaning about important things like Bush and what he is doing to your whole country. So get over it and get a life. You act like he had you at a sleep over with Jacko. Well did you? And if so............ Did you llike it? If any of you bothered to read my earlier post you'd know my opion of MJ but you all seem to racist or enudecated to do that. As with some of the posts in here; you'd swear it was a KKK site. WTF has OJ got to do with Jackson? As stated earlier (in this very topic), I think the guy is a freak. I also think some of you guys are racist and that makes you lot just as sick as Jackson. Yeah, piss and moan, go on, I know you will but it still does not excuse you from the way you lot behave. And give my your right eye. Given that thousands of people have slept over and only the proven scam artists (2) have sort to make money, I'd have no problem with doing that. The loosers here are the tax payer that will have to cover the Jackson legal costs, the DA with the 12 year grudge (and still doesn't rule out more harrassment) and the thousands of families the benifitted from Jacksons donations. He's all but admitted to out-right pedophilia is his infamous "interviews" ~ "it's a beautiful thing, everyone should sleep with children"... barf.gif Nothing a 12 guage enema can't cure... idea.gif I can see the implications you are trying to make by omitting key factors of what was said and your complete disregard for the context in which it was said. So knowing what was said and how it was said. How does one conclude that he is sexually involved with kids from that? I wonder where 'your' mind is. :oops: Edited June 15, 2005 by Vsicks Pathy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vsicks Pathy Posted June 15, 2005 Share Posted June 15, 2005 Lets not get personal,honestly he is weird and his having other people kids sleeping in his bed is weird, wrong and whatever. But he was not charged with being weird.. etc etc, he was charged with abuse. The prosecution came up short, because the alleged victim and his family are known liars and scam artisists. Lets be fair if our children were abused by someone...i don't think our first move would be to get our hair done, then call a civil suit lawyer. Assuming he is guilty..... he will get caught and dealt with. Assuming he is not guilty.... I would not blame him if he never helped another child again. What we all must remember is this facts are what the jury has to deal with,.... not emotions. Emotions have put a lot of people in jail... WRONGLY! Well put. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vsicks Pathy Posted June 15, 2005 Share Posted June 15, 2005 You guys are F*cked! He went before his peers and was found NOT GUILTY. I hope to hell none of you neigh sayers end up with money and have someone make the same accusations towards you. I don't think you'd be too quick in denouncing what is a fair and just system in a hurry if the shoe was on the other foot. Well if you admit to sleeping with little boys and inducing them with alcohol and admitting to it. You should then be casterated Now if this was some sshmuck off the street he would of been found guilty and would of spent the trial in jail! WTF are you talking about. I'm talking about the million dollar pedophile that you are saying is innocent. And if you agree with his antics on what he does to childeren then I put you in the same catagory as him. As KIDS CANNOT PROTECT THEMSELVES!!!! This is why before they tried him they waited for all the evidence and there was a ton with his "home videos" What kind of sick bastard does this to kids and you get off by saying we are f@#cked because he was found not guilty that should be good enough. -thnkboutit- Wake-UP and stop protecting the pedophile!!!!!!!! :oops: You guys do have issues don't you. Really! All I have said was "he was found not guilty by his peers". By HIS PEERS, not me. I have not given you my opinion at all other than to say that your system found him not guilty. Now I too am guilty without proof. LOL you guys are funny. I'd hate for you to be my judge. I am not aware that he admitted to having sex with young boys or that he said he gave them hard liquor. hell, I didn't even know he took the stand. Please post the link to these facts you have, I am only to pleased to read them. Though I am not sure what you mean by "inducing them". But if what you say is true, and that happend to one of my children, I would be the one in court. You know what I mean. sly As for the guy on the street. No money there. You know what I mean. sssh As for what I am saying, I am not saying anything. His peers said what was said. You however leave yourself wide open to litigation. He was found not guilty yet you seem to know better. I get the feeling you were there. Your not the two time looser prosicuter with a twelve year grude are you? You sound like him. Home videos. I've got some. I would think that most people have them. Are you saying his sex acts on young males are on the videos? You've seen this? I would be happy again to see your proof. I know how you guys are thinking (sick if you ask me) so I will rephase for you. Show me where child porn was entered as an exhibit. As for protecting a pedo? Is this pedo one that you make up or is it one that has been before the countries legal system and prooved guilty. If it is one in your head then I will protect an innocent person. If it is a real pedo then ..... well...... you know what I mean. This is meants a hammer hitting a pedo on the head. I look foward to reading all of the facts you have. I can't wait to jump on the band wagon with you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jj big shoe Posted June 15, 2005 Share Posted June 15, 2005 You guys do have issues don't you. Really! All I have said was "he was found not guilty by his peers". By HIS PEERS, not me. I have not given you my opinion at all other than to say that your system found him not guilty. Now I too am guilty without proof. LOL you guys are funny. I'd hate for you to be my judge. I am not aware that he admitted to having sex with young boys or that he said he gave them hard liquor. hell, I didn't even know he took the stand. Please post the link to these facts you have, I am only to pleased to read them. Though I am not sure what you mean by "inducing them". But if what you say is true, and that happend to one of my children, I would be the one in court. You know what I mean. As for the guy on the street. No money there. You know what I mean. As for what I am saying, I am not saying anything. His peers said what was said. You however leave yourself wide open to litigation. He was found not guilty yet you seem to know better. I get the feeling you were there. Your not the two time looser prosicuter with a twelve year grude are you? You sound like him. Home videos. I've got some. I would think that most people have them. Are you saying his sex acts on young males are on the videos? You've seen this? I would be happy again to see your proof. I know how you guys are thinking (sick if you ask me) so I will rephase for you. Show me where child porn was entered as an exhibit. As for protecting a pedo? Is this pedo one that you make up or is it one that has been before the countries legal system and prooved guilty. If it is one in your head then I will protect an innocent person. If it is a real pedo then ..... well...... you know what I mean. This is meants a hammer hitting a pedo on the head. I look foward to reading all of the facts you have. I can't wait to jump on the band wagon with you. Now THAT'S an eloquent response. You've made your opinoin known without telling everyone that they're "F*cked" and I thank you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Runnerman Posted June 15, 2005 Share Posted June 15, 2005 You guys do have issues don't you. Really! All I have said was "he was found not guilty by his peers". By HIS PEERS, not me. I have not given you my opinion at all other than to say that your system found him not guilty. Now I too am guilty without proof. LOL you guys are funny. I'd hate for you to be my judge. I am not aware that he admitted to having sex with young boys or that he said he gave them hard liquor. hell, I didn't even know he took the stand. Please post the link to these facts you have, I am only to pleased to read them. Though I am not sure what you mean by "inducing them". But if what you say is true, and that happend to one of my children, I would be the one in court. You know what I mean. sly As for the guy on the street. No money there. You know what I mean. sssh As for what I am saying, I am not saying anything. His peers said what was said. You however leave yourself wide open to litigation. He was found not guilty yet you seem to know better. I get the feeling you were there. Your not the two time looser prosicuter with a twelve year grude are you? You sound like him. Home videos. I've got some. I would think that most people have them. Are you saying his sex acts on young males are on the videos? You've seen this? I would be happy again to see your proof. I know how you guys are thinking (sick if you ask me) so I will rephase for you. Show me where child porn was entered as an exhibit. As for protecting a pedo? Is this pedo one that you make up or is it one that has been before the countries legal system and prooved guilty. If it is one in your head then I will protect an innocent person. If it is a real pedo then ..... well...... you know what I mean. This is meants a hammer hitting a pedo on the head. I look foward to reading all of the facts you have. I can't wait to jump on the band wagon with you. Ok Mr.Jackson Advocate I never said child porn read the post I said home movies along with his pic album that the jury had seen with the boy pics. If you have the same pics and home movies like Jackson then I say you should also be in the casterated department. Don't get me started when people like you stick up for the wrong side when the children are the victims! But this means nothing as long as Mr.Rich Jackson was not found guilty so he is innocent. Give me a break. Use your fricken head the one with the brain. Well since you are walking a fine line I will simmer from this conversation as I cannot stand you people that stick up for these types of people you really need some mental help !!!!!! And if you have kids then I truly am sickened :oops: and I literaly am sick by this conversation and your side. You can stick up for the pedophile all you want in my books you are one in the same. I take it like this, here you go tellling people they are F@cked up but really look at the evidence shown. Which seems you already have so again Mr.Advocate you are as sick as him! Judge,Jury and Excutioner I am done and will no longer talk to someone like you that can look at the money part and disregard the children that were hurt by him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jj big shoe Posted June 15, 2005 Share Posted June 15, 2005 Sorry floks, this will be a long one: Tone what down massa? Eyes been a good nigga; please massa dun beats me no mo.Uncalled for.You my friend, do not understand your own legal system do you? HE WAS FOUND NOT GUILTY! So were the cops that beat Rodney King on video, as well as the rioters that looted L.A. and beat truck driver Reginald Denny on video. So you see, not everyone found not guilty is innocent.I don't see you pissing and moaning about important things like Bush and what he is doing to your whole country. That's not the topic here. If you start that thread, I'll piss and moan with the best of them.So get over it and get a life. You act like he had you at a sleep over with Jacko. Well did you? And if so............ Did you llike it?Once again, uncalled for.If any of you bothered to read my earlier post you'd know my opion of MJ but you all seem to racist or enudecated to do that. It's spelled "uneducated". As with some of the posts in here; you'd swear it was a KKK site. WTF has OJ got to do with Jackson? As stated earlier (in this very topic), I think the guy is a freak. I also think some of you guys are racist and that makes you lot just as sick as Jackson. Yeah, piss and moan, go on, I know you will but it still does not excuse you from the way you lot behave. Agreed.And give my your right eye. Given that thousands of people have slept over and only the proven scam artists (2) have sort to make money, I'd have no problem with doing that. Good point. The loosers here are the tax payer that will have to cover the Jackson legal costs, the DA with the 12 year grudge (and still doesn't rule out more harrassment) True. and the thousands of families the benifitted from Jacksons donations. A man can donate millions to very worthy causes, but that doesn't necessarily make him a benevolent man. Pablo Escobar did many gracious things for the citizens of Columbia but was a muderous drug lord. I'm not comparing Jackson to Escobar, just trying to make a point about charitable acts. I felt I should respond to this post because of the personal attacks. I probably shouldn't have made the "sequened glove" comment earlier, but I felt provoked by the "F*cked" on your post. For that I apologize. I'd like to bury the hatchet now but if you would like to correspond, please use the pm link in my profile. Thanks, JJ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Precise1 Posted June 15, 2005 Share Posted June 15, 2005 Jackson is a freak. If he is guilty freak, I don't know; wasn't there and didn't hear the evidence. Doesn't really matter... If you choose to let a freak sleep with your children, well, that makes you a bad parent. Hopefully, was just a scam, but regardless, that kid is going to be messed up, thats the loss in this case. Unfortunately, VERY few millionaires, much less famous people, are convicted of serious crimes in this country. That says a lot, but does it reflect here ??? Mmm, could be.... But then maybe not, maybe he is just a freak.... You guys are F*cked! Thats just VSick throwing gas on the fire. While he is informed and literate, he tends to post harsh a commentary sometimes... Remember, we all have opinions along with the other end of the pipe; they tend to be worth the same at times. There, thats my a$$... B Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vsicks Pathy Posted June 15, 2005 Share Posted June 15, 2005 (edited) Sorry floks, this will be a long one: Tone what down massa? Eyes been a good nigga; please massa dun beats me no mo.Uncalled for.You my friend, do not understand your own legal system do you? HE WAS FOUND NOT GUILTY! So were the cops that beat Rodney King on video, as well as the rioters that looted L.A. and beat truck driver Reginald Denny on video. So you see, not everyone found not guilty is innocent.I don't see you pissing and moaning about important things like Bush and what he is doing to your whole country. That's not the topic here. If you start that thread, I'll piss and moan with the best of them.So get over it and get a life. You act like he had you at a sleep over with Jacko. Well did you? And if so............ Did you llike it?Once again, uncalled for.If any of you bothered to read my earlier post you'd know my opion of MJ but you all seem to racist or enudecated to do that. It's spelled "uneducated". As with some of the posts in here; you'd swear it was a KKK site. WTF has OJ got to do with Jackson? As stated earlier (in this very topic), I think the guy is a freak. I also think some of you guys are racist and that makes you lot just as sick as Jackson. Yeah, piss and moan, go on, I know you will but it still does not excuse you from the way you lot behave. Agreed.And give my your right eye. Given that thousands of people have slept over and only the proven scam artists (2) have sort to make money, I'd have no problem with doing that. Good point. The loosers here are the tax payer that will have to cover the Jackson legal costs, the DA with the 12 year grudge (and still doesn't rule out more harrassment) True. and the thousands of families the benifitted from Jacksons donations. A man can donate millions to very worthy causes, but that doesn't necessarily make him a benevolent man. Pablo Escobar did many gracious things for the citizens of Columbia but was a muderous drug lord. I'm not comparing Jackson to Escobar, just trying to make a point about charitable acts. I felt I should respond to this post because of the personal attacks. I probably shouldn't have made the "sequened glove" comment earlier, but I felt provoked by the "F*cked" on your post. For that I apologize. I'd like to bury the hatchet now but if you would like to correspond, please use the pm link in my profile. Thanks, JJ The term I used (F*cked) is not meant to be personal or have any malice, but is generic like the term WTF. If you want it to be about you, I can't help that. As for educated, I know how it is spelt. It is obvious what happend there anyway. Look at the way you spelt Folks. The home movies issue? I must say you have perplexed me. I feel guilty now when I think about taking/watching movies of my son and his soccer team or even birthday parties. I fear of how you would post the fact that I have home movies of them. You make it sound torrid when in fact it is not. For calling a spade a spade you guys have labled me guilty of protecting a pedo and being just as bad as one. I think if we were to look at personal attacks we need look no further than your own posts. I understand people get passionate about subjects and they can lose site of the facts. I have asked for the facts to be pointed out to me (still waiting). Untill I see them I can only assume that they are not facts but opinions. Having said that, I do not begrudge anyone one their opinions, it is when they put their opinions or what they heard up as fact it becomes an issue. He said she said didn't work in a court of law so why should it work here. There is no need to apologise to me. As for the hatchet, there was no hatchet. There is no need to reframe from the topic. I will endevour to be a little more cautious when using four letter words in the future. All I am trying to say is that he was found not guilty. That is the "fact" of the matter. For the record I do not recall me ever saying that he was found innocent either. Not that I would not say so. I am not a fan of his and nor am I his brother. How many 'stars' would invite and share what they have personally with needy people. As for the latest on Jacko, he has vowed never to let anyone into his room or share his bed ever again. I agree, this is a good thing. I have never condoned his actions. Although reading what has been said about me you'd think I helped him. Just be happy, his career, life and standing are all in ruins now anyway. Just hope that nothing similar ever happens to you or someone close to you. Or to me for that matter. Here is some thing for all you guys to think about. My son, 13, has on occasion had a mate stay over when my daughter, 10, has a friend over at the same time. On occasions like that they share thier beds. Eg. my son and his mate and my daughter and her friend. None of you have ever done this though; am I right? Go on then........................... your opionion on this please. How perverted are my wife and I? And our kids must surley be having same sex relations. Edited June 15, 2005 by Vsicks Pathy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vsicks Pathy Posted June 15, 2005 Share Posted June 15, 2005 You guys are F*cked! Thats just VSick throwing gas on the fire. While he is informed and literate, he tends to post harsh a commentary sometimes... Remember, we all have opinions along with the other end of the pipe; they tend to be worth the same at times. There, thats my a$$... B You got me sussed. Now stop giving the game away. :X Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
k9sar Posted June 15, 2005 Share Posted June 15, 2005 ok... I'll spend my 2 cents.... There has always been controversy surrounding Jackon. In this case, children were involved. Nobody said that he drove around to schoolyards and dangled candy and alcohol out the window to entice kids to go with him. All those who stayed at his place (and I hear that there were more than a few) were there with the knowledge and most likely approval from their parents. Personally, I would never have let my kids anywhere near him but apparently there are those 'fans' who were so in love with him and his music when they were growing up that they trust their children with him. Shame on them. It is ultimately the parents responsibility to protect their children whenever possible (and I throw that in because there are times when it is not possible and the responsibility falls on some other institution like a school or similar). Anyway, don't blame the kids, they probably didn't know any better. Blame the parents for placing their children in a situation that was potentially dangerous. Blame Jackson for violating the parents trust and whatever children he violated either physically or emotionally. Is our court system perfect? no. Are criminals set free due to technicalities? yes. Do innocent people go to prison unjustly? yes. The legal system is based on 'winning' not on 'justice'. It's lawyer against lawyer and they are paid large sums of money to 'win' by whatever means necessary. Replace lawyers with investigators/factfinders and present the data to the jury. Eliminate the "in case such and such back in 1802, blah blah blah was determined to be yadda yadda so you have to do the same here..." crapola. Judges and jurys do make bad decisions, it's human nature. Let's not use those bad decisions as the basis for more bad decisions. I HATE F**KING LAWYERS!!!! (no offense intended if any of you are of that profession). I should say... I HATE F**KING DEFENSE ATTORNEYS!!! anyway.... here's another $0.02 as I feel I may have run over my initial fee. If Michael Jackson was walking across the street in front of my truck, my brakes would mysteriously fail. Oh wait... I'll say that I was so shocked by the hideous creature in front of me that I accidently hit the gas instead of the brake. Get me a lying, cheating, money grubbing defense attorney and I'm sure I'll be not only found not-guilty, but I'll get a medal for community service. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vsicks Pathy Posted June 15, 2005 Share Posted June 15, 2005 ok... I'll spend my 2 cents.... There has always been controversy surrounding Jackon. In this case, children were involved. Nobody said that he drove around to schoolyards and dangled candy and alcohol out the window to entice kids to go with him. All those who stayed at his place (and I hear that there were more than a few) were there with the knowledge and most likely approval from their parents. Personally, I would never have let my kids anywhere near him but apparently there are those 'fans' who were so in love with him and his music when they were growing up that they trust their children with him. Shame on them. It is ultimately the parents responsibility to protect their children whenever possible (and I throw that in because there are times when it is not possible and the responsibility falls on some other institution like a school or similar). Anyway, don't blame the kids, they probably didn't know any better. Blame the parents for placing their children in a situation that was potentially dangerous. Blame Jackson for violating the parents trust and whatever children he violated either physically or emotionally. Is our court system perfect? no. Are criminals set free due to technicalities? yes. Do innocent people go to prison unjustly? yes. The legal system is based on 'winning' not on 'justice'. It's lawyer against lawyer and they are paid large sums of money to 'win' by whatever means necessary. Replace lawyers with investigators/factfinders and present the data to the jury. Eliminate the "in case such and such back in 1802, blah blah blah was determined to be yadda yadda so you have to do the same here..." crapola. Judges and jurys do make bad decisions, it's human nature. Let's not use those bad decisions as the basis for more bad decisions. I HATE F**KING LAWYERS!!!! (no offense intended if any of you are of that profession). I should say... I HATE F**KING DEFENSE ATTORNEYS!!! anyway.... here's another $0.02 as I feel I may have run over my initial fee. If Michael Jackson was walking across the street in front of my truck, my brakes would mysteriously fail. Oh wait... I'll say that I was so shocked by the hideous creature in front of me that I accidently hit the gas instead of the brake. Get me a lying, cheating, money grubbing defense attorney and I'm sure I'll be not only found not-guilty, but I'll get a medal for community service. Ask for your 2 cents back buddy. You had a chance to spend it on something intelligent but blew it. The only true thing you said was that it was a potentually dangerous situation. I couldn't agree with you more. Lucky it was Jacko they were with. Granted what he does beggars belief but they could easily have been with a some sick mined idiot that can't keep their mind out of the gutter for two seconds, and think that killing or maining people will earn them a medal. Use your imagination some more. Instead of your brakes failing, why not tie the innocent, be they disfigured, obese, blind, mute, mentally ill, too thin, wrong hair colour, too much money, not enough money or what ever your prejudices are, to the back of your car and drag them around. You and could get a real sence of justice served then. I hope you do not show your kids the crap you post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vsicks Pathy Posted June 15, 2005 Share Posted June 15, 2005 You guys do have issues don't you. Really! All I have said was "he was found not guilty by his peers". By HIS PEERS, not me. I have not given you my opinion at all other than to say that your system found him not guilty. Now I too am guilty without proof. LOL you guys are funny. I'd hate for you to be my judge. I am not aware that he admitted to having sex with young boys or that he said he gave them hard liquor. hell, I didn't even know he took the stand. Please post the link to these facts you have, I am only to pleased to read them. Though I am not sure what you mean by "inducing them". But if what you say is true, and that happend to one of my children, I would be the one in court. You know what I mean. sly As for the guy on the street. No money there. You know what I mean. sssh As for what I am saying, I am not saying anything. His peers said what was said. You however leave yourself wide open to litigation. He was found not guilty yet you seem to know better. I get the feeling you were there. Your not the two time looser prosicuter with a twelve year grude are you? You sound like him. Home videos. I've got some. I would think that most people have them. Are you saying his sex acts on young males are on the videos? You've seen this? I would be happy again to see your proof. I know how you guys are thinking (sick if you ask me) so I will rephase for you. Show me where child porn was entered as an exhibit. As for protecting a pedo? Is this pedo one that you make up or is it one that has been before the countries legal system and prooved guilty. If it is one in your head then I will protect an innocent person. If it is a real pedo then ..... well...... you know what I mean. This is meants a hammer hitting a pedo on the head. I look foward to reading all of the facts you have. I can't wait to jump on the band wagon with you. Don't get me started when people like you stick up for the wrong side when the children are the victims! But this means nothing as long as Mr.Rich Jackson was not found guilty so he is innocent. Give me a break. Use your fricken head the one with the brain. Well since you are walking a fine line I will simmer from this conversation as I cannot stand you people that stick up for these types of people you really need some mental help !!!!!! And if you have kids then I truly am sickened :oops: and I literaly am sick by this conversation and your side. You can stick up for the pedophile all you want in my books you are one in the same. I take it like this, here you go tellling people they are F@cked up but really look at the evidence shown. Which seems you already have so again Mr.Advocate you are as sick as him! Judge,Jury and Excutioner I am done and will no longer talk to someone like you that can look at the money part and disregard the children that were hurt by him. This is what you wrote. This is why before they tried him they waited for all the evidence and there was a ton with his "home videos" What kind of sick bastard does this to kids and you get off by saying we are f@#cked because he was found not guilty that should be good enough. togo.gif So what were you saing here? Ok Mr.Jackson Advocate I never said child porn read the post I said home movies along with his pic album that the jury had seen with the boy pics. If you have the same pics and home movies like Jackson then I say you should also be in the casterated department. You know you are starting to look a little silly now don't you? Don't get me started when people like you stick up for the wrong side when the children are the victims! I cannot stand you people that stick up for these types of people you really need some mental help !!!!!! And if you have kids then I truly am sickened :oops: and I literaly am sick by this conversation and your side. So the innocent is the wrong side is it? Define you people for me please. You can stick up for the pedophile all you want in my books you are one in the same. What pedophile are you talking about? Judge,Jury and Excutioner This is exactly why you guys should be proud of the legal system you have. I mean he says it all here. I did not even have to respond it speaks for its self. I am done and will no longer talk to someone like you that can look at the money part and disregard the children that were hurt by him. Shall I interprat what this insolent person means? ...... I can not prove a single word I said, so bye. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Runnerman Posted June 16, 2005 Share Posted June 16, 2005 Shall I interprat what this insolent person means? ...... I can not prove a single word I said, so bye. Just to interpret and make it crystal clear it meant. I put you in the same catagory with M/J in my eyes and the way others see him as well as the pedo he is. Don't give me this crap of innocence as you make me sick by thinking you are right and if you have pics and vids of your kids like he does then ya you are to a pedo!!!!! 1#-So Brain Up :idea: and you need some physcological help :help: . Thought I would clarify what I meant as you seem to be stuck with you thinking you are right Now that's funny. Stick up for Jackson make you feel better. Take a bow If this is how you get your kicks then refer back to #1 You seem like a know it all type of person where they are proved wrong and still have to argue. In your case you quote others as you have nothing that has any bearing except that MJ was found NG. Yes YOU ARE RIGHT ABOUT THAT. Ya pedo's get the breaks to. Guess your just happy with it. maybe you should spend the night at Neverland with MJ and get your fill I usually say my 2cents and that's it but seems your a very rude person so you get what you give. I'm just one of the many that are sickened by your stupid remarks. Please quote and prove my point sssh Now I'm done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dnodog Posted June 16, 2005 Share Posted June 16, 2005 Face it folks only people who know if jackson abused the boy is the boy and jackson himself. Child abuse is wrong, I think we All Agree, and just because someone does not agree with anyt of us, is no reason to have the personal attacks. Maybe I should find another forum because these personal attacks and name calling are childish, and make me SICK :oops: But as a non american i have to say this America brags about it's democracy and legal system, while trying to stuff it's tradtions and ways of doing things down other countries throats{ not always bad..but not always good}. Here however a man is found not guilty by his peers, yet members of that society{ i.e Americans} are still calling for this man's head and testicles. What ever happened to the term on which American Law is based........... Innocent until proven guilty. Maybe the legal system is joke over there. But then again the president was elected by judges. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Precise1 Posted June 16, 2005 Share Posted June 16, 2005 Maybe the legal system is joke over there.But then again the president was elected by judges. That about sums it up in my book, but you forgot that the president then turns around and apoints (or tries) judges.... B Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vsicks Pathy Posted June 16, 2005 Share Posted June 16, 2005 Shall I interprat what this insolent person means? ...... I can not prove a single word I said, so bye. Just to interpret and make it crystal clear it meant. I put you in the same catagory with M/J in my eyes and the way others see him as well as the pedo he is. Don't give me this crap of innocence as you make me sick by thinking you are right and if you have pics and vids of your kids like he does then ya you are to a pedo!!!!! 1#-So Brain Up :idea: and you need some physcological help :help: . Thought I would clarify what I meant as you seem to be stuck with you thinking you are right Now that's funny. Stick up for Jackson make you feel better. Take a bow If this is how you get your kicks then refer back to #1 You seem like a know it all type of person where they are proved wrong and still have to argue. In your case you quote others as you have nothing that has any bearing except that MJ was found NG. Yes YOU ARE RIGHT ABOUT THAT. Ya pedo's get the breaks to. Guess your just happy with it. maybe you should spend the night at Neverland with MJ and get your fill I usually say my 2cents and that's it but seems your a very rude person so you get what you give. I'm just one of the many that are sickened by your stupid remarks. Please quote and prove my point sssh Now I'm done. Make up your mind, he had kiddy porn or not? You have tried to bait me and you have got two hopes of me ever sinking to your level. The facts speak for themselves. NOT GUILTY. Now go and take your childish name calling and your, I am so far up myself that I have turned insideout, attitude else where. Frankly I am not the only one sick of your BS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
treywurst Posted June 16, 2005 Share Posted June 16, 2005 Do yall know the real reason Michael Jackson was found not guilty?... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... Because no jury in America would convict a middle aged white woman of those charges!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
k9sar Posted June 16, 2005 Share Posted June 16, 2005 What ever happened to the term on which American Law is based...........Innocent until proven guilty. it became superceeded by "win at all costs, regardless of guilt or innocence" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vsicks Pathy Posted June 16, 2005 Share Posted June 16, 2005 Do yall know the real reason Michael Jackson was found not guilty?...... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... Because no jury in America would convict a middle aged white woman of those charges!!! I like it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Precise1 Posted June 17, 2005 Share Posted June 17, 2005 LOL, is this STILL going on ??? Not a lot of 'between the lines' reading going on here, is there ? Got a joke based in the above... Did you know MJ is the greatest success story in the US, ever ? No one else has started life as a poor black child and ended up a rich white woman !!! B Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now