Jump to content

NismoSkyZ

Members
  • Posts

    3,669
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by NismoSkyZ

  1. I don't see much difference between the two, they put the lights on it like the newer one if u ask for it...It might be more economical for me just to get a new bumper and install the grill guard and KC's i have sitting in my garage then to buy a winch mount bumper when Ill never put a winch on it...nice day dream though

     

    From my experience, I would definitly go with an armored bumper. Then again, I fixed my busted front end myself.

  2. That one would fit the 96-99. Pezzy's running a TJM for a 96-99 application on her 99.5, and it fits just fine. The only issue is the antenna tab, which had to be ground off. I would assume the only issue you'd have with fitting that bumper to an older R50 would be a slight gap in the center of the bumper near the grill.

     

    Well thanks for that...now I know what I'm saving for :)

     

    I would also suggest a quick search both here and on Pirate 4x4 for KMA. It's always good to know what experience others have had with them before making that kind of investment. :shiftyeyes:

     

    Definitley check out their customer service records.

     

    http://www.kenmtnac.com/WinPat9699.html

     

    They do...i really like that look...how much of a difference will installing one of these make for engine temp since now the only place the fan is pulling air from is in front of the grill? Im considering this since i need to replace my bumper anyway after an accident.

     

    To each his own, I suppose. ;)

  3. Look t some 31" BFG A/T's. It doesn't look like there is a lift on yours, and I have the same tints. It's actually not tinted, but injected glass. It was a bitch to get my fronts to match the backs so I got black put on the backs in addition to the injected glass. Check out my sig.

  4. You mean Buicks and rocks are different...so Buicks aren't rocks? Lol, I have had both the 3.3 and now the 3.5. I still love and miss greatly my 3.3, but the 3.5 never struggles for power.

     

    The 3.3 is like the older chevy's with slow v6's...partly what I miss. The word is "SPUNK" that is what the older R50's had that the news don't have. The 3.3 with cams, intake, and exhaust was plenty tough even with the injectors failing on my rig. My 3.5 has power that seems untapped. I need the higher gears, as I have the 4.36's...but there seems to be power that is still hidden from me, the truck digs out of poor RPM's/gears adn puts power to the ground. I really am thinking of having the ECU sent to JET for flashing.....this is the benefit of the 3.5 all that technology just like LAXMAN said.

     

    The WD's have ECU's...

×
×
  • Create New...