Jump to content
  • Sign In Changes:  You now need to sign in using the email address associated with your account, combined with your current password.  Using your display name and password is no longer supported.

 

  • If you are currently trying to register, are not receiving the validation email, and are using an Outlook, Hotmail or Yahoo domain email address, please change your email address to something other than those (or temporary email providers). These domains are known to have problems delivering emails from the community.

veilside180sx

Members
  • Posts

    50
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Previous Fields

  • Your Pathfinder Info
    1995 WD21 4x4
  • Mechanical Skill Level
    Skilled/Experienced Mechanic
  • Your Age
    Choose
  • What do you consider yourself?
    Rarely Go Off-Road
  • Model
    SE
  • Year
    1995

veilside180sx's Achievements

NPORA Regular

NPORA Regular (2/5)

0

Reputation

  1. The SBC is actually more compact than the VG30DETT, therefore easier to stuff in there.
  2. The VTC (not VVL or VVT) on the VG30DETT and S14 SR only adjust the intake cam timing. The only motor in that genre/time frame that had true VVT or VVL (variable valve lift) as Nissan calls it, was the SR20VE/SR16VE.
  3. Thankfully, I have no issues with you disagreeing.=) I have yet to decide what I will eventually do to power mine.
  4. I'm well aware of what you are saying. I see this in the KA as well. The SOHC due to the single large exhaust valve, flows better down low due to increased velocity than the DE. It's the difference between sucking through two straws vs one large. Obviously the higher up in the range you go, the DOHC will become more effective.
  5. I honestly don't see the point. It's hard enough to find room in the WD engine bay for one turbo...let alone two tiny T too small's. The DOHC in this application isn't necessarily going to help much, as the SOHC many times will flow better down low (where we need it) To each his own, and good luck with it. I'd settle for having room to stuff a single 50 trim in and call it a day w/o having to use a stupid oil pump to get it back in the pan.
  6. Don't get me started on those screw balls. Feel free to search around on sr20forum.com and you'll see all the stuff they've screwed up. An SR is not necessarily difficult (not much different than in an S chassis), but there is no reason to give up the torque you would be with a square 2.0 vs 2.4 with a long stroke. JGS KA D21 dyno at 7psi
  7. Would be stupid to swap a KA with a SR in a D21/WD21. The KA with it's larger displacement makes considerably more torque and spools the turbo faster.
  8. Yes, you'll need a press to be able to install the wheel bearings.
  9. I had the exact same issue. Had to ovalize it, and cut off a corner to make it work. Next time around...I'll just make my own from scratch.
  10. Nissan ecu's don't like piggy back's. The self learning features will typically negate a good deal of any changes you would make anyway. Almost all piggy backs alter the maf voltage to make adjustments which throws off the timing curve. Reflashing the ecu is the best practice, but still requires someone with competence to have set it up.
  11. Just find a 3.3 shortblock, then don't have to worry about that.
  12. The SR wouldn't be my first choice for the heavy Pathfinder. There just isn't enough torque for hauling around a 3800 lb rig w/o getting higher into the powerband frequently. It'll easily make the power, but you'll more than likely get annoyed having to rev it out all the time. (this coming from someone that has owned over 25 SR powered vehicles) Your money would be much better spent just having someone build a single turbo setup for your existing VG. Something with a small/mid size T3, or 50 trim would be perfect for it. It would offer good spool, plenty of power, and the top end if wanted. I've been debating doing this, or keeping it NA with the 3.4L build.
×
×
  • Create New...